Why an English document dated "10 February 1719" might really mean February 1720 — and how to work out which king's "fourth year" actually was.
Two separate dating problems tend to trip people up in English documents before the mid-eighteenth century, and they often get tangled together because they overlap in time. This guide takes them one at a time: first the calendar itself — when the year began, and the 1752 switch from Julian to Gregorian dating — and then regnal years, the "in the fourth year of the reign of..." formula you will meet constantly in legal and official documents.
From the thirteenth century until 1752, the legal and civil year in England began on 25 March — Lady Day, the feast of the Annunciation — not on 1 January. So a document dated, in its own words, "10 February 1719" was written in what we would now call February 1720: the writer's "1719" would not tick over to "1720" until 25 March.
This is separate from — but easily confused with — the Julian/Gregorian calendar question below. A document can have an Old Style year-start problem, an Old Style/New Style day-count problem, or both at once.
Most of continental Europe had already moved the start of the year to 1 January well before England did. English diarists and record-keepers who corresponded with the Continent — or simply wanted to avoid ambiguity — increasingly used a "double-barrelled" or dual-dated year for anything falling between 1 January and 24 March: for example, 30 January 1648/49. The first figure is the legal year as an English clerk of the time would have written it; the second is the year by modern reckoning. Writers producing material purely for an English audience — Samuel Pepys among them — often stuck to the old single-year form throughout.
By the eighteenth century, the Julian calendar Britain was still using had drifted eleven days behind the Gregorian calendar most of Catholic Europe had adopted back in 1582. The Calendar (New Style) Act 1750 fixed this in two moves:
Scotland had already moved its own start-of-year to 1 January back in 1600, but kept the Julian day-count in step with England until the same 1752 reform brought the whole of Britain onto the Gregorian calendar together.
Historians use OS (Old Style) for the Julian-calendar dating used in England before 1752, and NS (New Style) for the Gregorian dating used on the Continent throughout, and in Britain from 1752 onward. The gap between the two was ten days until 1700, and eleven days from 1700 onward.
William of Orange's fleet landed at Torbay on 5 November 1688 by the English (OS) calendar — but 15 November 1688 by the calendar in use on the Continent (NS).
Queen Anne died on 1 August 1714 (OS) — 12 August 1714 (NS).
Before the mid-twentieth century, English official, legal and parliamentary documents were routinely dated not by calendar year at all, but by the year of the reigning monarch — "the fourth year of the reign of King George the Second," commonly abbreviated in print as something like "4 Geo. 2." This is the regnal year, and it runs on its own clock, quite separate from either the calendar year or the legal year discussed above.
A monarch's first regnal year begins on the exact date of their accession — not 1 January, not Lady Day, but the specific day they became sovereign — and each subsequent regnal year begins on the anniversary of that date. King George III, for example, acceded on 25 October 1760; his second regnal year therefore ran from 25 October 1761, his third from 25 October 1762, and so on. Because every monarch acceded on a different date, the "regnal year start date" is different for every reign, and you cannot use one reign's pattern to guess at another's.
Take the calendar year the document was written in, and subtract the monarch's accession year. If the document's month and day fall before the accession's month and day, that is your answer; if on or after, add one.
Example: a document dated 2 May 1662 falls in the reign of Charles II, whose regnal years are (officially) counted from 1649. 1662 − 1649 = 13; since 2 May falls after his regnal start date of 30 January, add one — giving the 14th year of Charles II.
This is the one that catches people out. Charles II did not actually become king until the Restoration, on 29 May 1660 — but his regnal years are officially counted from 30 January 1649, the day his father Charles I was executed. The eleven years of the Commonwealth and Protectorate were struck from the official legal record entirely, as though Charles II had been reigning, uncrowned, throughout. The practical effect: when the Restoration actually happened in May 1660, the official record regarded it as already being in the 12th year of his reign. If you see a document dated in a low regnal year of Charles II — "1 Car. 2" or "2 Car. 2" — and the content plainly describes events of 1660 or later, this is why: those numbers correspond to 1649–1651, not to the start of his actual rule.
The 1752 reform also had to account for the eleven missing days of September. George II's 26th regnal year, which had begun on 11 June 1752, was extended by eleven days so that it still ran a full year — meaning that from 1753 onward, his regnal year began on 22 June rather than 11 June. This kind of small adjustment around 1752 is worth watching for in any document from that specific window.
| Monarch | Regnal years counted from | Year 1 begins |
|---|---|---|
| Elizabeth I | 17 November | 1558 |
| James I | 24 March | 1603 |
| Charles I | 27 March | 1625 |
| Charles II | 30 January (see note above) | 1649 (official) / 1660 (actual rule) |
| James II | 6 February | 1685 |
| William & Mary | 13 February | 1689 |
| William III (alone, from Mary's death) | 28 December | 1694 |
| Anne | 8 March | 1702 |
| George I | 1 August | 1714 |
| George II | 11 June (22 June from 1753) | 1727 |
| George III | 25 October | 1760 |
You will also see documents dated only by law term and regnal year — "Michaelmas term, 5 George II" — with no specific day given. The four law terms (Hilary, Easter, Trinity and Michaelmas) were the periods when the higher courts sat, and a great deal of Chancery and Common Pleas business is dated this loosely rather than to a specific calendar day. If precision matters, the regnal year narrows things to a roughly twelve-month window; the term narrows it further to a few weeks within that.
A single document can involve all three of these conventions at once: a Lady-Day legal year, an Old Style Julian date, and a regnal year dated from a king's accession rather than his actual reign. When transcribing, the safest approach is always the same — record the date exactly as the document gives it, then add your own note translating it into a modern calendar date if that will help the reader. Never silently substitute one for the other.
Calendar and regnal year figures checked against the Calendar (New Style) Act 1750, and against the regnal year tables compiled from C. R. Cheney and Michael Jones, A Handbook of Dates for Students of British History (Royal Historical Society Guides and Handbooks No. 4, Cambridge University Press, revised ed. 2000), and Sweet & Maxwell's Guide to Law Reports and Statutes (4th ed., 1962). The regnal date for Charles II reflects the official legal fiction described in these sources, not his actual accession to power in 1660.
If you've got a document with a regnal year, a term date, or an Old Style date that doesn't seem to match the events it describes, I'm happy to help puzzle it through.
Request Your Consultation